Identity
- Manufacturer
- Model number, in full — suffixes usually encode capacity and options
- Serial number, legible character by character
- Unit tag as labeled on the machine
- Schedule tag it appears to correspond to, if different
Survey checklist
What to capture on each unit before you walk away from it, set out by discipline. The test for every field below is the same: if it is missing, does someone have to come back?
Capture on every unit: manufacturer, model, serial number, the tag as labeled on site, location to room level, electrical rating, the capacity rating for that equipment type, and observed condition. Then run the closeout checks before leaving — unreadable plates, unmatched schedule rows and unplaced captures are cheap to fix on site and expensive afterwards.
01: Volts / phase / Hz
02: FLA — full load amps
03: MCA — minimum circuit ampacity
04: MOCP — max overcurrent protection
05: Motor HP or kW
06: Fed from
| Field | Applies to | What it decides |
|---|---|---|
| Volts / phase / Hz | All powered equipment | Confirms supply compatibility on replacement |
| FLA — full load amps | Motors and packaged units | Input to electrical design review |
| MCA — minimum circuit ampacity | Packaged HVAC equipment | Nameplate ampacity requirement for design review |
| MOCP — max overcurrent protection | Packaged HVAC equipment | Upper limit on breaker or fuse size |
| Motor HP or kW | Fans, pumps, compressors | Drive sizing and energy calculations |
| Fed from | Every unit, where traceable | What goes dark when a panel is isolated |
A checklist works when the checking happens at capture time. Worked through afterwards against a folder of photos, it mostly generates a list of things you can no longer fix.
That is the argument for capture that validates as it goes: field data collection covers the on-site half, and the HVAC checklist goes deeper on airside and waterside plant specifically.
What information should be captured from MEP equipment?
Record the manufacturer, model, serial, site tag, location and observed condition, plus the ratings relevant to the equipment and survey scope. Capture a printed manufacture date when present; retain the serial for identification and supported date lookups.
Why capture the tag from the machine when the drawing already has one?
Because they disagree more often than people expect. Contractors renumber during installation, replacements inherit new tags, and tenant fit-outs invent their own conventions. Recording the site tag and the schedule tag separately is what makes the two traceable to each other.
Is a photograph of the nameplate enough on its own?
No. A plate photograph with no context cannot tell you which room the unit was in, which of four identical machines it was, or what it appeared to serve. The plate is one of several captures per unit, not the whole capture.